LADY COLIN CAMPBELL
ON HER BESTSELLER:
'THE UNTOLD LIFE OF QUEEN ELIZABETH; THE QUEEN MOTHER'
CaribbeanBELLE Magazine
PETER JARRETTE
BELLE readers met Lady Colin
Campbell, the best selling international author, last year in an exclusive BELLE
interview at her London home. Now in
Queen Elizabeth II’s Diamond Jubilee year explodes the book about Britain’s late, most senior royal, Queen Elizabeth the
Queen Mother. Lady Colin Campbell’s
latest work has eyes wide and tongues wagging around the world with revelations
of the real life and times of this long-lived royal steeped in modern history.
BELLE and Peter Jarrette
re-visit the famous Jamaican born Lady Colin Campbell, herself a royal and
international high-society figure for an exclusive Q&A for the Caribbean on
her recently released international tome on this much admired royal. THE QUEEN MOTHER is available worldwide
and details for stockists are at www.dynastypress.co.uk
Available at all good booksellers and online worldwide
BELLE: How has the build up to The Queen
Mother (TQM) kept you engaged since
you graced the pages of BELLE late last year and how long
has the work involved to bring this blockbuster to the world’s eyes taken you?
Lady CC: TQM has taken me one
year to prepare, beginning to end.
However, the main part of my research...the juicy bits have been known to me for years. The important elements
of TQM have been known to me for much of my life by the sheer virtue of the
people I have known, the people I still know and the people I have been related
to. These will be the bits not
accessible to the public at large or most writers and journalists. The year has
been dedicated to fleshing out TQM’s story, researching her important ‘dates’,
a perfunctory search that has required much time and diligence but these
details are the nuts and bolts that must be very sound in fact. This citing of
dates and places in the life and times of a subject are naturally the muscle,
bones and flesh of the telling of a story of this calibre and of an historical
figure such as TQM. The research can be
arduous but it must all stand-up and be accurate. TQM enjoyed a long life,
nearly 102 eventful years and I set about to detail not only her life and
settings but also the lives of those around her and how her story impacted on
others. I have written about her before in my 1993 book Royal Marriages less comprehensively but still that gave me a
further starting advantage as I had previous research to draw on.
BELLE: How did you come to write TQM, what
inspired you to enlighten the world about this intriguing figure from the
British royal family?
Lady CC: It was suggested to me
that I tell the story since I knew the real
story and I had the courage to do so. It occurred to me that if I passed
without writing this work on TQM her true story would disappear. This is the
story that other people TQM and I knew in common were privy to as well and from
these circles were a number of individuals who, again, encouraged my move
forward with the truth. As we knew of the fictional
Diana before the world learned of the factual
Diana there is the fictional Queen Mother. Before I wrote 1992’s The Real Diana the truth about The
Princess of Wales was only hinted at by other writers. In the case of TQM it
occurred to me that unless I began to write her true story nothing would be
written to such depth on her, or it was not very likely to be. As I am getting on in years so are the people
who are closest to the true story and in fact even TQM’s grandchildren are no
longer youngsters! You know, writers
like Hugo Vickers knew a whole lot
more than they finally wrote on this formidable woman’s real life story. So
many other writers who have embarked on delivering the real-life facts behind
the fiction of royals in the end only hint at the truth. The story of Queen Elizabeth, the Queen
Mother now is an historical subject and though she will always have relevance,
the likelihood of a younger writer coming along in 10 or 20 years to write on
her real life in depth is remote at best and so I felt it was now or never. It
would be a shame to let a fabulous historical figure, such as she was,
disappear couched in fantasy when her reality is much more interesting.
At home with Georgie: Image Tristan Galinski
BELLE: You are a well placed figure within
the world of publishing, media, royal European society and high society in many
countries. With many friends on both sides of palace doors did this assist
greatly in the building of TQM or did you work exclusively to stories you were
already privy to and research material?
Lady CC: I absolutely could not
have written this without the personal and professional knowledge I had access
to. As I said I knew the facts as a result of the families I knew and the world
I live in. I knew of close associates of the Windsor’s since my school days. My
family and I were also close friends too to the respected hotelier and founder
of Jamaica’s Round Hill, John Pringle who functioned for a time as aide de camp to the Duke of Windsor in
the Bahamas. Obviously my step
mother-in-law Margret Duchess of Argyll was friends many years back with TQM. The
Duchess of Argyll was also friendly with The Duke and Duchess of Windsor...it
is supposed that she may have had an affair with The Duke of Kent.
In the book
there is a picture of a gathering on the royal balcony at Buckingham Palace
with my relative Princess Louise, long dead, who was one of the earlier
Duchesses of Argyll. She was the sixth child and fourth daughter of Queen
Victoria and her husband, Albert, Prince consort. She was not at all fond of the young Elizabeth
and her strong views against Elizabeth were well known, discussed and
remembered by the Argyll Clan.
Again...this is family information that not many writers can impart with
such provenance. Now, the Reverend Phillip
Hart of the Kingston Jamaica Parish was a very close friend to my family in
Jamaica and he too proved to be a great source of information. He was friendly with Princess Alice, Countess
of Athlone who, in 1950, became the First Chancellor of the University of The
West Indies. She wintered in Jamaica. She was candid in her friendship with the
Reverend Hart and she spoke openly and at depth and length of the senior royals
and none of it was in the confessional. So you see...the Reverend Hart, when
visiting my family, would simply tell us! Thinking back to those days I never
thought that these intimate stories would end up in a bio. These were insights
to lives and events that, like in the case of Diana Princess of Wales, just
dropped into my lap!
BELLE: What were some of the most engaging
qualities of TQM?
Lady CC: Having met her first
hand I found her to be so many things...TQM was utterly charming, magnificent,
charismatic and truly extraordinary! She shone like a beacon and not because
she was the TQM. The woman herself was magnetic. I am not alone in saying that
the secret of her success as TQM, why she became such a revered figure was that
she, as a Bowes Lyon personified the exquisite Bowes Lyon manners. She was
well-bred and her charm and superb manners appeared to be natural. I have never
encountered manners in any walk of life or nationality that can or ever will
match her own. Elizabeth, the Queen
Mother loved people and in turn she loved to be loved by people. She loved her
exulted role as Queen Mother to her nation and the Commonwealth. She was
consistent in it and at it and functioned with pure enjoyment. She could turn
the otherwise dull into the spectacular. TQM wanted to be entertained and to be
entertaining and easily displayed her ability to entertain with her quick wit
and extremely sharp intelligence. She loved jokes and laughter and didn’t stand
on too much ceremony but she did like people to be respectful in how they
interacted with her. She was also very kind to workers, attendants and staff.
She had personality in abundance and set out to be that marvellous personality and
always behaved as such.
BELLE: ...and some of her more formidable
traits?
Lady CC: Nobody could tell her
‘no’. She would never be hurried. Everything
with her was as if in slow-motion. I’m
in mind of a famous episode in WWII where when TQM was being ushered with her
family from Windsor Castle during an air raid she moved at her own pace as
bombs rained down in the vicinity. That refusal to be rushed even when danger
loomed was a sign of tremendous passive aggression, an indomitability of will, a trait
displayed throughout the whole of her life. She was unforgiving...extremely so
and she was decisive. She set about implementing whatever agenda she felt was
in her, the monarchy’s or the country’s best interests. She had a very potent
personality and was extremely dynamic and forceful...everybody who dealt with her
has commented as such. She brooked no opposition and never took no for an
answer. TQM demanded her wishes always be fulfilled and was extremely assertive
to an extraordinary degree. She was a concealed carapace of candy floss. In
fact the famed fashion photographer Cecil Beaton remarked that she was a “marshmallow forged in steel...” The
aristocrat Stephen Tennant declared that “she
was the opposite of everything she was...where she was soft and sweet, she was
hard as nails.”
A quote of hers appears in my book... “I believe in the steel hand and velvet
glove approach. All a woman needs is a strong will...and a smile.”
TQM had a personality made for success and she set out
to achieve this with her own mother’s help with a glorious platform to function
from and with help too from friends she found even more glory. Very little she
achieved was accidental. She had true self belief and with that she always,
always believed she was on the side of good and right.
BELLE: In your opinion what are some of
the most misunderstood things about the life and time of TQM?
Lady
CC: That she was a victim of fate who had a great destiny foisted upon
her. That she was a sweet old lady who was a prisoner of circumstance. Why, she
even said herself, “I’m not as nice as
people think I am.” People don’t realise to what extent she was the architect
of the Duke and Duchess of Windsor’s destruction.
BELLE: What then, ultimately was TQM’s negative
influence on the more modern royals from her daughters to today’s younger set
of high profile royals?
Lady CC: Well, this is a very
interesting question but I must go back to her adult beginnings somewhat to
better illustrate the nature of her reach and influence. As a young woman Elizabeth was actively and
deliberately old fashioned. This was one of the things that militated in her
favour with her father-in-law, King George V.
The King had an antipathy towards anything modern. This bent for the old
fashioned suited Elizabeth in many other ways. She did not have the looks,
figure or stature that was the mode of the time...that of the roaring 20’s belle.
She was too short, squat and plump, not sleek and chic so she held that
affinity for the old fashioned styles, ways and carriage. Had her brother-in-law,
King Edward VIII (The Duke of Windsor)
remained on the throne everything would have been different. He was a true
modernizer. Where The Duke of Windsor craved and encouraged all that was new,
his brother Bertie and TQM represented old style and order and they both had an
active glance backwards which was seen by their supporters as a great advantage
politically and socially. Therefore their daughters, our current Queen,
Elizabeth II and Princess Margaret were deliberately uneducated as TQM thought
an education for girls was not good. You see she was brought up in a stifled
way too and deliberately set out to replicate her own short comings. She may
have been a great wit and naturally intelligent but she herself was no
academic. So Queen Mary, Elizabeth II’s and Princess Margaret’s grandmother and
their Governess Marion ‘Crawfie’
Crawford joined forces along with The Archbishop of Canterbury to ensure the
two princesses were assured some concrete education. In fact you know, Margaret
never forgave her mother this neglect.
The girls at that time had no education
but superb social skills but this was deemed to be a looming problem if
Elizabeth II was to be Queen. Both girls were naturally intelligent and craved
education to augment their relevance as humans and princesses. Once Lilibet (Elizabeth
II’s nickname) grew up she opted for Phillip against TQM’s wishes as she
knew she needed a husband who himself would be formidable enough to stand up to
TQM and afford Elizabeth II some separation from what she herself found to be
the all encompassing, strangling element of TQM’s far reaching and sometimes
unwelcome influence. This was one of Phillip’s virtues. He was an overt man with a strong character
who, in short, protected her from her mother. Margaret and TQM were not an
entirely happy mix and Margaret flew the coup as soon as she could...to put it
mildly!
Colin Glenconner (3rd
Lord Glenconner and owner of the island of Mustique) wanted to marry
Margaret but he could not abide TQM. He
held throughout his life, his firm conviction that TQM ‘ruined’ Margaret’s life. TQM was never, never supportive of
Margaret.
Of her grandchildren she adored Prince Charles and
Margaret would often remark “Of course
she does, because he will one day be King.”
TQM set out again quite deliberately to undermine
affairs and this time it was to undermine Queen Elizabeth II’s and Phillip’s
relationship with their son and heir to the throne, Prince Charles as a boy, so
that she would be able to influence the direct future of the monarchy. She would continue to wield power through her
grandson as she did through her husband Bertie (King George VI) who didn’t draw breath without consulting her. Even
the King’s ministers and secretaries commented that “There are two Monarchs on the throne...George VI and Elizabeth.” The King was known to always say to his private secretaries “Leave the papers here (on his desk) and I will sleep on it.” He meant he’d
present them to his wife for her consideration. Winston Churchill, who had
respect for TQM’s political acumen, famously changed his two person weekly
Prime Ministerial meeting with the King to include her. Two became three!
The Duke of Windsor was driven to remark “My brother is a nincompoop whose wife has
him wrapped around her little finger.”
TQM was cordial
to her other grandchildren, Princess Anne and the princes Andrew and Edward.
She was a good grandmother but not an engaged one to them. In later years with
her great grandchildren she was like an affectionate dog lover patting a dog.
There was no engagement of substance...I imagine there was too big a gap in the
generations.
BELLE: TQM was famously known
for being economic with her voice and views publicly but was there a time in
history where she may have been more forthright over palace politics in
relation to her Prime Ministers and world affairs?
Lady CC: TQM was very right wing.
She however was careful to preserve the fiction that she was not anywhere as
involved as she was politically. When George VI died she went to great lengths
to get Churchill to revamp the role of Dowager
Queen, which had been of reduced significance compared to that of Queen
Consort which she had enjoyed since coming to the throne at the age of 36. She
reigned alongside George VI for only 16 years until his death aged 56, TQM was
aged 51. She wanted more say and a more powerful role than had hitherto been
ever been known in the history of the monarchy. By the time she had been
through ‘nobbling’ Churchill Queen
Elizabeth II found herself with two consorts, her husband Prince Phillip and
her mother, TQM. For the rest of her
life TQM now enjoyed a significantly more enhanced role as a public figure far
beyond anything that had ever been known in the annals of the monarchy.
IMAGES: MELISSA BUCHANAN
BELLE: As a wife how would TQM have summed
up her marriage?
Lady CC: Her husband, Bertie,
George VI thought her the most wonderful woman on earth because she was such a
strong, forceful and inaccessible figure. Both her husband and his brother The Duke of Windsor
wanted strong, dominant, intense, witty and ultimately inaccessible women to
replicate their mother, Queen Mary, who loved them but was distant. They wanted great homemakers who were highly
domestic unlike royal women of those days. Both of these women, Queen Mary and
her daughter-in-law TQM, kept their men at an arms-length, whose devotion they
ended up appreciating. However neither woman would have married those men if
they weren’t the Prince of Wales and the Duke of York respectively. They
married them purely for advancement. They functioned within their marriages at
a certain level of disdain for their husbands.
This remains an interesting phenomenon played-out still in penthouses,
chateaus, castles and in many properly middle class marriages around the world!
BELLE: As a leading light of
society how do you think TQM balanced more frivolous aspects of a women’s life
like fashion with her moral and societal obligations?
Lady CC: In her generation, what
we see as ‘frivolous’, was seen then as fundamental.
TQM used clothes to enhance her position with her old fashion stance and
styling. Remember, she could not embody the easy chic of the times with her
build and height. Actually, very interestingly during WWII she made sure that
every female member of the royal family was forced to wear army uniforms. She
however chose not to. A very clever ploy you must admit, to keep her elegance.
There were some extreme beauties of their time, chic women like Lady
Mountbatten , Princess Marina and the Duchess of Kent, who were renowned
fashion forward style firebrands that were most put out, angered really, by
this uniform enforcement. Like her
nemesis, Wallis Simpson, TQM loved a party. In the Victorian age for most women
there was nothing but family, social life and charity...the women in high strata
tinkled at things as opposed to working. That was their platform. They didn’t have to balance anything...they
had to sparkle and be good, worthy hostesses. TQM turned her work into pleasure
in her married life and throughout her long, long widowhood.
BELLE: What sort of woman would TQM
represent herself like today in the current social times?
Lady CC: A Queen...a great star!
She had great self image. You could see that she was enacting the role of
‘wonderful’. She was the same to the end and she would be the same today. The
essence of her being was an interaction between desire and realization...potency!
Considering she was born in the time of
horse and buggy and lived to see the landing on the moon and the internet while
remaining steadfastly old fashioned is ironic. She had the ability to make
things work for her. She would be the sort of person a psychologist would love
their patient to end up being...assertive, open and bending situations to her
advantage.
BELLE: Have you met with any
resistance from the royal family, figureheads or royal aides therein to the
telling of the true story of the TQM’s life and times?
Lady CC: No. The royal family
knew it was in the making. The photo of my relative, The Duchess of Argyll on
the royal balcony was given to me specifically for the book by the Palace.
People misunderstand the royal family. The book is a truthful and fair
presentation. Even royal personages who are revered and respected are human and
all my biographies examine them in their entirety, I am writing about
everything, even the less flattering bits. To be panegyric is not possible
about anybody. I know my onions. I am
always fair, not sensationalist and causing no damage...just writing.
BELLE: ...and the possibility of TQM’s and
her brother David Bowes Lyon’s being born to a French kitchen servant?
Lady CC: The circumstances of Elizabeth's birth have for a long time been
the subject of conjecture and as a responsible biographer I felt it was my duty
to examine them in as dispassionate and incisive a way as possible. I have no
axe to grind one way or the other and could not care less whether Elizabeth was
born to Cecilia Strathmore or Marguerite Rodiere. Nor do I think it
should matter to anyone who gave birth to her. She was a much-wanted
and much-loved child, and there is absolutely nothing wrong if her parents
resorted to an early form of surrogacy to bring her into this world. In
the book I take pains to examine all the facts in a balanced and sensible
manner and to make the point that the way to clear up the mysteries is to have
DNA testing. The fact that the newspapers have taken a less considered
view and put words into my mouth does not mean that I have said what they
state, though one cannot decry their reportage, as they have had to convey a
complex predicament in a few sentences while I had a whole chapter at my
disposal. Those who wish to know the facts can read the book.
LADY COLIN CAMPBELL & PETER JARRETTE
IMAGES: MELISSA BUCHANAN
BELLE: Does it concern you that
some palace aides suggest that the book and its revelations have caused Queen
Elizabeth II some concerns of her own?
Lady CC: Buckingham
Palace are fully aware of my reputation for writing truthful and penetrating
biographies and willingly provided photographic co-operation, as anyone looking
at the credits in the book can see. It is hardly likely that they
would have been co-operating on the one hand, if they thought that the contents
of the book would upset the Queen. There is little doubt in my mind
that Her Majesty knew her mother rather better than most of us, and that
nothing anyone could say would actually catch her unawares.
BELLE: Have you had the chance to see Madonna’s WE and how do you feel TQM was depicted in it?
Lady
CC: I saw the movie WE and thought that
Madonna's depiction of Elizabeth was by and large accurate though I was
severely discomfited by some of the sequences with the Duke and Duchess.
BELLE: We asked your publishers about their role in this internationally
explosive book and one of their Directors did have a moment to comment: “Nothing I
can say is of much relevance to anyone – we are just the publisher, letting our
author tell her story as she wishes and we have no particular stance or axe to
grind against the monarchy or anyone else for that matter.” BELLE would like to thank you for your time
with us again and to finally ask...what will we be reading from you next time?
Lady CC: A very modern book on contemporary etiquette
Archived Interview
CaribbeanBELLE is a Safari Publishing title available through the Caribbean and USA/Canda online via Barnes & Noble
PETER JARRETTE IS AN ARTIST AND INTERNATIONALLY PUBLISHED AUTHOR OF SEVERAL FICTION, NON-FICTION AND MEMOIR ADULT TITLES AND CHILDREN'S BOOKS. HE IS A COLUMNIST AND CELEBRITY INTERVIEWER.
No comments:
Post a Comment